—Я вообще против того, чтобы кто-то устраивал демарши. Но даже если они будут, это не сломает созданную систему. Она четко работает: Гран-при, Кубок мира, кандидатский турнир… Хочешь выскочить из нее — выскакивай. Но твое место займет кто-то другой.

Letter to FIDE

To: FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov & FIDE World Championship Committee.
Reference is made to the ongoing World Championship cycle.

The purpose of this letter is to inform you of my decision not to take part in the planned Candidate Matches between March and May 2011.

After careful consideration I’ve reached the conclusion that the ongoing 2008–2012 cycle does not represent a system, sufficiently modern and fair, to provide the motivation I need to go through a lengthy process of preparations and matches and to perform at my best.

Фирменный «шеманский» пиджак «Arctic Sea»

Reigning champion privileges, the long (five year) span of the cycle, changes made during the cycle resulting in a new format (Candidates) that no World Champion has had to go through since Kasparov, puzzling ranking criteria as well as the shallow ceaseless match-after-match concept are all less than satisfactory in my opinion.

By providing you with four months notice before the earliest start of the Candidates as well as in time before you have presented player contracts or detailed regulations, I rest assured that you will be able to find an appropriate replacement.

Although the purpose of this letter is not to influence you to make further changes to the ongoing cycle, I would like to take the opportunity to present a few ideas about future cycles in line with our input to FIDE during the December 27th 2008 phone-conference between FIDE leaders and a group of top-level players.

In my opinion privileges should in general be abolished and a future World Championship model should be based on a fair fight between the best players in the World, on equal terms. This should apply also to the winner of the previous World Championship, and especially so when there are several players at approximately the same level in the world elite. (Why should one player have one out of two tickets to the final to the detriment of all remaining players in the world? Imagine that the winner of the 2010 Football World Cup would be directly qualified to the 2014 World Cup final while all the rest of the teams would have to fight for the other spot.)

One possibility for future cycles would be to stage an 8-10 player World Championship tournament similar to the 2005 and 2007 events.

The proposal to abolish the privileges of the World Champion in the future is not in any way meant as criticism of, or an attack on, the reigning World Champion Viswanathan Anand, who is a worthy World Champion, a role model chess colleague and a highly esteemed opponent.

Rest assured that I am still motivated to play competitive chess. My current plan is to continue to participate in well-organised top-level tournaments and to try to maintain the no 1 spot on the rating list that I have successfully defended for most of 2010.

Best regards,
IGM Magnus Carlsen

profan
Спасибо большое за информацию об РКЦ, уважаемый Elista.
Не могли бы вы порекомендовать также, что либо для чтения о положении Русской Православной Церкви?

В связи с тематикой каппаросных "искупительных ритуалов", появился вопрос о протодиаконе Андрее Кураеве.
На Ваш взгляд, является ли Кура-ев заместительной жертвой для своего вышестоящего руководства?

Возможно ли на данном этапе познаний в этой области, сделать какой-либо прогноз и предать его всеобщей огласке, относительно планируемых закулисой событий, исходя из их жесткой каббалистической привязке к конкретным датам? Например, о предостережении рава Михаэля Лайтмана относительно 2012 года. Это было бы конкретным ударом по закулисью и несомненно привлекло внимание не только самих иудопердикторов, но возможно подтолкнуло бы гоев к детальному изучению данного вопроса.
С уважением, profan.

«We have a curious Dictionary, which was made by a very learned Man, in which the Numbers from 1 to 10,000 fill the left hand column, in Order, and opposite them are written all the sacred or important Words which add up to each Number.»

I am not a spiritualist who accepts any message as of divine origin. I insist on knowing with whom I am talking, and on his showing such qualities of mind that the communication will benefit me.

Now, as it happened, I had a test question to my hand. I had taken the name Baphomet as my motto in the O.T.O. For six years and more I had tried to discover the proper way to spell this name. I knew that it must have eight letters, and also that the numerical and literal correspondences must be such as to express the meaning of the name in such a ways as to confirm what scholarship had found out about it, and also to clear up those problems which archaeologists had so far failed to solve.

Her Wizard answered my question without hesitation. "Wrong," said I, "there must be eight letters." "True," he answered, "there is an R at the end." The answer struck me in the midriff. One theory of the name is that it represents the words Beta alpha phi eta mu eta tau epsilon omicron sigma , the baptism of wisdom; another, that it is a corruption of a title meaning "Father Mithras". Needless to say, the suffix R supported the latter theory.

I added up the word as spelt by the Wizard. It totalled 729. This number had never appeared in my Cabbalistic working and therefore meant nothing to me. It however justified itself as being the cube of nine. The word chi eta phi alpha sigma, the mystic title given by Christ to Peter as the cornerstone of the Church, has this same value. So far, the Wizard had shown great qualities! He had cleared up the etymological problem and shown why the Templars should have given the name Baphomet to their so-called idol. Baphomet was Father Mithras, the cubical stone which was the corner of the Temple.

I therefore felt justified in concluding that the Wizard really possessed sufficient intelligence to make it worth my while to listen to him. I hastily recorded the dialogue to that point. My next question inquired his name. He replied "Amalantrah". I added this up. This time the result was conclusive. Its value is 729. Already he had shown me that I, in my office as Baphomet, was the rock on which the New Temple should be built, and he now identified himself with me through his own name being of equivalent value.

There was however so far no link between the Order to which he belonged and the Great Order; 729 is not a significant number in the Cabbala of Thelema. But when I asked him to assign a mystic name to the Camel, he replied "Ahitha" which adds to 555, an obvious correlative with my own number in the Great Order, 666. It defined, so to speak, the function of the Camel in that Order.

Striking as were these results, I maintained my sceptical method and proceeded to apply test after test. The Wizard never made the slightest mistake.

On the night of February 24th, I happened to want to know whether I could use my name in the Great Order, Tau Omicron Mu Epsilon Gamma Alpha Theta Eta Rho Iota Omicron Nu , (TO MEGA THPION), in conjunction with Hebrew letters. The Wizard replied, "Yes." I asked, "Shall I use the whole name or Theta Eta Rho Iota Omicron Nu alone?” He answered, "Theta Eta Rho Iota Omicron Nu alone."
I then spent some hours in trying to transliterate Theta Eta Rho Iota Omicron Nu into Hebrew in such a way as to give a number which would mean something in my general Cabbalistic scheme. I failed completely!

On Monday morning I went to the office of The International. (Заметьте, с июля 1917 года Кроули редактировал в Нью-Йорке посвященный еврейскому оккультизму журнал «Интернационал».) It was a "workless Monday", Dr Garwood having ordered that no office buildings should be heated on Monday for five weeks, on account of the coal famine. I stayed only a few minutes to look over my mail.

On Tuesday I returned to the office, and found on my desk a letter addressed to Viereck and transferred by him to me to be answered. This letter had therefore arrived the day before and had been written in Bridgeport, connecticut, on Saturday evening at the identical hour at which Amalantrah had told me that I could use a Hebrew spelling of Theta Eta Rho Iota Omicron Nu in my work.

The writer of the letter was one Samuel A. Jacob, a designer of Syrise and similar founts of type. He was an entire stranger to anyone in the office, as to myself. His letter concluded, "Please inform your readers that I, Shmuel bar Aiwaz bie Yackou de Sherabad, have counted the number of The Beast; and it is the number of a man: Th = 400 R = 200 I = 10 V = 6 N = 50," giving the spelling תריונ = 666.

At the exact time, therefore, when the Wizard had told me that this could be done, a stranger in a distant town was actually writing the solution which baffled me. Observe that the preparation of this was the problem in my article "The Revival of Magick" published three months earlier!

… Besides his Americanized signature "Samuel A. Jacob", he gave his true name: "SHMUEL Bar AIWAZ bie YACKOU de SHERABAD". I could hardly believe my eyes. Till that moment I had had no idea that Aiwass was anything but an artificial name, like Ahitha. I had tried to find a spelling for it, having never seen it written except in the English in The Book of the Law, but only heard it. I had decided on AIVAS = 78, the number of Mezla, the influence from the highest unity, and therefore suitable enough as the title of a messenger from Him.

I wrote to Mr Jacob for the Hebrew spelling which he gave as OIVZ (עיוז  - мое прим.), whose value is 93. The import of this discovery was terrific; 93 is the value of Theta Epsilon Lambda Eta Mu Alpha , the Word of the Law proclaimed by Aiwass, and of Alpha Gamma Alpha Pi Eta , Love, part of the interpretation of Theta Epsilon Lambda Eta Mu Alpha .

«Книга Закона», 93=418

It was also that of the Lost Word of freemasonry, which I had re-discovered, thus linking up the mysteries of the O.T.O. with those of the A.'. A.'.. 93 is also the number of the Secret Word of the Neophyte of A.'. A.'., a word indicating symbolically the whole course of existence. It is in fact a completion of the ideas contained in the Sacred Word of the Hindus, AUM.

It was to be discovered later that the Secret Key of The Book of the Law is the number 31, 1/3 of 93. There are three words, each of the value of 31 which represent perfectly the whole mystery of existence. (Снова привет от Ал. Ал. Алехина!) That Aiwaz should have, so to speak, signed himself with His Law, was irrefutable proof of his existence.

I must add one cumulative proof which came to light only in 1923. The Book of the Law claims to express its ideas not by its literary meaning alone but by the actual letters of the manuscript. It had annoyed me --- after the above demonstration --- that in the manuscript the name was spelt AIWASS, which does not add to 93. But this year, reflecting that "The Book of the Law" is connected more with the Greek Cabbala than with the Hebrew, I transliterated AIWASS into Greek off-hand. Its value is 418! and this is the number of the Magical Formula of the Aeon. It represents the practice of the Book as 93 does the theory. It is now evident with what inconceivable ingenuity AIWAZ has arranged his expression. He is not content to give one spelling of his name, however potent; he gives two which taken together are not merely twice as significant as either alone, but more so, in a degree which is beyond me to calculate.
This incident with its many ramifications is perhaps the most remarkable thing that has ever happened to anybody.

My leg and my Sunday School record alike conspiring to keep me out of the trenches, and my deplorable lack of stupidity disqualifying me for the Intelligence Department, I accepted an invitation to go to New York.
I went to America by the Lusitania, on October 24th, 1914…

Trotsky was living in New York City when the February Revolution of 1917 overthrew Tsar Nicholas II. He left New York on 27 March but his ship, the SS Kristianiafjord, was intercepted by British naval officials in Canada at Halifax, Nova Scotia and he spent a month detained at Amherst, Nova Scotia. After initial hesitation, the Russian foreign minister Pavel Milyukov was forced to demand that Trotsky be released, and the British government freed Trotsky on 29 April. He finally made his way back to Russia on 4 May.

marignon
А где можно почитать (но только связно и последовательно) обо всех этих хетах, двурах, арканах и т.п.?
И вот еще какой вопрос: по-вашему, начиная с какого момента и какой страны каббалисты стали реально влиять на мировую политику?
Все же в Средние века они были еще маргиналами. Или по-вашему нет? Вы проверяли средневековые события на наличие матричного символизма?

Общая фальсификация истории, по всей видимости, была осуществлена в соответствии с определенным планом. Однако, в таком случае, учитывая, что целью данной фальсификации было представить общественному мнению в качестве «прогресса» то самое отклонение, о котором мы говорили выше, остается сделать вывод, что само это отклонение является результатом направляющей воли.

Нам бы не хотелось пока настаивать на этих выводах. Так или иначе, речь должна была бы идти лишь о коллективной воле, поскольку во всем этом присутствует нечто, значительно превышающее поле действия отдельно взятых индивидов; даже само понятие «коллективной воли» едва ли является вполне адекватным в данном случае.

Как бы то ни было, если отвергнуть веру в слепой случай, мы вынуждены признать существование эквивалента некоего предустановленного плана, который, тем не менее, не обязательно мог быть закреплен в каких-либо документах. Не боязнь ли открытий подобного рода сделала суеверие «письменных свидетельств» единственным основанием так называемого «исторического метода»? При опоре на этот метод, все самое существенное неизбежно ускользает от внимания исследователей, а всем желающим копнуть глубже тут же указывают на «ненаучность» их подхода, что немедленно обрывает всякую дальнейшую дискуссию.

Ничто так не ограничивает «интеллектуальный горизонт» человека и его способность ясно видеть некоторые вещи, как чрезмерное увлечение «книжной эрудицией». Разве из одного этого не ясно, почему в академических кругах навязываются именно методы, превращающие «эрудицию» в самоцель?
http://wpc.freeforums.org/topic-t8-15.html